Every era of commerce has had its version of the same puzzle: what makes something valuable when identical things are freely available?
In the physical world, this was straightforward. Scarcity was imposed by nature. A diamond was rare because the earth produced few of them. A handwoven silk sari commanded a premium because the labour could not be industrialised beyond a point. The relationship between scarcity and price was direct and intuitive.
The digital economy has upended this relationship in ways that most brand builders are still catching up with. It has not eliminated scarcity. It has moved it. And the brands that have not noticed the move are the ones struggling to charge for what they offer.
The core shift is this: digital technology has created extraordinary abundance in content, information, and media – while simultaneously creating new forms of scarcity in experiences, access, and participation.
And the brands that understand where abundance ends and scarcity begins are the ones building durable pricing power.
Consider how information moved before the Internet. A recipe was something you inherited from your grandmother or found in a cookbook you purchased. A music album required a physical object – a vinyl record, a cassette, or a CD. A university lecture was available only to those who enrolled and attended in person.
Distribution required effort, money, and physical infrastructure. This imposed natural limits on supply, which in turn supported pricing.
Digital distribution dissolved all of these constraints. Today, a recipe is a search query away. An album streams for free on ad-supported platforms. A lecture from a Nobel laureate is available on YouTube to anyone with a phone and a data connection. The marginal cost of reproducing and distributing digital content has fallen to effectively zero.
When supply becomes infinite, the price the market will bear for the content alone drops accordingly. This is not a failure of the market. It is the market working precisely as it should. Abundance drives prices down.
Which is why industries built on selling information – journalism, music, publishing, and education – have spent two decades reinventing their revenue models. The product they once sold (the content) is now the thing they give away. The thing they charge for has shifted elsewhere.
If content has become abundant, what remains scarce?
The answer, consistently across industries, is the same: things that cannot be digitally reproduced.
A concert recording can be shared. The experience of being in the arena when A. R. Rahman plays ‘Jai Ho’ live cannot. Millions can watch a TED talk. The experience of being at the TED conference – the hallway conversations, the introductions, the community – is limited to those in the room.
Apple streams its product launches to hundreds of millions of viewers. But the experience of being inside the auditorium, handling the device before the world sees it, and meeting the engineering team – that access is restricted to a few hundred people. The broadcast builds influence. The experience preserves exclusivity.
Fashion weeks in Paris, Milan, and Mumbai are streamed globally. Yet brands invest enormous resources in the physical event because the real currency is not the runway show itself. It is the access, the networking, and the industry relationships that form around the show. The spectacle is shareable. The access is not.
In each case, the same principle holds: the freely distributed layer builds reach and relevance, while the scarce layer captures value.
This principle is increasingly evident in the way Indian consumer brands structure their business models.
In each case, the brand gives away the shareable layer generously and designs its revenue model around the layer that cannot be forwarded.
For brand builders, the implication is not to restrict the spread of content or information. That battle was lost the moment distribution became free. And it was a battle not worth fighting, because the spread of content is precisely what builds the reach and cultural relevance that brands need.
The implication is to design the business model with a clear-eyed understanding of which layer generates fame and which layer generates revenue. These are rarely the same layer. And the brands that conflate them – that try to monetise the content layer directly or that neglect the experience layer entirely – find themselves famous but unprofitable, or profitable but invisible.
Let the content travel freely. It builds awareness, trust, and cultural presence.
But invest disproportionately in the layer that cannot be replicated – the experience, the access, the personalisation, the community, the physical environment.
These are the elements that remain scarce in an abundant world. And therefore, these are the elements that sustain pricing power.
As digital networks expand further, content will only become more abundant. AI will generate more media. Distribution barriers will keep falling. Every brand will have access to the same visibility tools.
Which means visibility itself will cease to be a differentiator.
The brands that win will be the ones that understand a simple yet easy-to-forget truth: the things that spread the farthest are not the things people pay for. And the things people willingly pay for are often the ones that cannot be shared at all.
This is not an argument against digital content. Content is the engine of discovery, and without it, no brand reaches the people it needs to reach. But discovery is the beginning of the journey, not the destination. The destination is the moment when a customer encounters something that feels irreplaceable – an experience, a relationship, a sense of belonging – and decides it is worth paying for precisely because it cannot be forwarded to someone else.
Presence over content. Participation over impressions. Belonging overreach.
That is where brand value lives now. And that is where it will increasingly live in the years ahead.
[1] Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan. https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781137280114/thezeromarginalcostsociety/
[2] Anderson, C. (2009). Free: The Future of a Radical Price. Hyperion. https://www.harpercollins.com/products/free-chris-anderson
[3] Pine, B.J. & Gilmore, J.H. (1998). ‘Welcome to the Experience Economy.’ Harvard Business Review, July–August 1998. https://hbr.org/1998/07/welcome-to-the-experience-economy
[4] Wenger, A. (2016). ‘Digital Technology.’ The World After Capital. https://worldaftercapital.gitbook.io/worldaftercapital/digital
[5] Goldman Sachs (2024). ‘Live Music Industry Revenue Worldwide from 2022 to 2030.’ via Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1096424/live-music-industry-revenue-worldwide/
[6] MarketsandMarkets (2025). ‘Live Entertainment Industry Worth 0.29 Billion by 2030.’ https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/live-entertainment.asp
[7] Custom Market Insights (2025). ‘Global Live Music Market Size, Trends, Share 2025–2034.’ https://www.custommarketinsights.com/report/live-music-market/
[8] TED Conferences. ‘About TED Conferences.’ https://www.ted.com/attend/conferences
[9] TED Conferences. ‘TED2026: All of Us — Membership and Attendance.’ https://conferences.ted.com/ted2026/attend
[10] IFPI (2025). ‘Global Recorded Music Revenues Grew 4.8% in 2024.’ https://www.ifpi.org/ifpi-amidst-highly-competitive-market-global-recorded-music-revenues-grew/
[11] Sisario, B. (2024). ‘Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour Made a Record
Fashion weeks in Paris, Milan, and Mumbai are streamed globally. Yet brands invest enormous resources in the physical event because the real currency is not the runway show itself. It is the access, the networking, and the industry relationships that form around the show. The spectacle is shareable. The access is not.
In each case, the same principle holds: the freely distributed layer builds reach and relevance, while the scarce layer captures value.
This principle is increasingly evident in the way Indian consumer brands structure their business models.
In each case, the brand gives away the shareable layer generously and designs its revenue model around the layer that cannot be forwarded.
For brand builders, the implication is not to restrict the spread of content or information. That battle was lost the moment distribution became free. And it was a battle not worth fighting, because the spread of content is precisely what builds the reach and cultural relevance that brands need.
The implication is to design the business model with a clear-eyed understanding of which layer generates fame and which layer generates revenue. These are rarely the same layer. And the brands that conflate them – that try to monetise the content layer directly or that neglect the experience layer entirely – find themselves famous but unprofitable, or profitable but invisible.
Let the content travel freely. It builds awareness, trust, and cultural presence.
But invest disproportionately in the layer that cannot be replicated – the experience, the access, the personalisation, the community, the physical environment.
These are the elements that remain scarce in an abundant world. And therefore, these are the elements that sustain pricing power.
As digital networks expand further, content will only become more abundant. AI will generate more media. Distribution barriers will keep falling. Every brand will have access to the same visibility tools.
Which means visibility itself will cease to be a differentiator.
The brands that win will be the ones that understand a simple yet easy-to-forget truth: the things that spread the farthest are not the things people pay for. And the things people willingly pay for are often the ones that cannot be shared at all.
This is not an argument against digital content. Content is the engine of discovery, and without it, no brand reaches the people it needs to reach. But discovery is the beginning of the journey, not the destination. The destination is the moment when a customer encounters something that feels irreplaceable – an experience, a relationship, a sense of belonging – and decides it is worth paying for precisely because it cannot be forwarded to someone else.
Presence over content. Participation over impressions. Belonging overreach.
That is where brand value lives now. And that is where it will increasingly live in the years ahead.
[1] Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan. https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781137280114/thezeromarginalcostsociety/
[2] Anderson, C. (2009). Free: The Future of a Radical Price. Hyperion. https://www.harpercollins.com/products/free-chris-anderson
[3] Pine, B.J. & Gilmore, J.H. (1998). ‘Welcome to the Experience Economy.’ Harvard Business Review, July–August 1998. https://hbr.org/1998/07/welcome-to-the-experience-economy
[4] Wenger, A. (2016). ‘Digital Technology.’ The World After Capital. https://worldaftercapital.gitbook.io/worldaftercapital/digital
[5] Goldman Sachs (2024). ‘Live Music Industry Revenue Worldwide from 2022 to 2030.’ via Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1096424/live-music-industry-revenue-worldwide/
[6] MarketsandMarkets (2025). ‘Live Entertainment Industry Worth $270.29 Billion by 2030.’ https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/live-entertainment.asp
[7] Custom Market Insights (2025). ‘Global Live Music Market Size, Trends, Share 2025–2034.’ https://www.custommarketinsights.com/report/live-music-market/
[8] TED Conferences. ‘About TED Conferences.’ https://www.ted.com/attend/conferences
[9] TED Conferences. ‘TED2026: All of Us — Membership and Attendance.’ https://conferences.ted.com/ted2026/attend
[10] IFPI (2025). ‘Global Recorded Music Revenues Grew 4.8% in 2024.’ https://www.ifpi.org/ifpi-amidst-highly-competitive-market-global-recorded-music-revenues-grew/
[11] Sisario, B. (2024). ‘Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour Made a Record $2 Billion of Ticket Sales.’ The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/09/arts/music/taylor-swift-eras-tour-ticket-sales.html
[12] Techdirt (2006). ‘The Importance of Zero in Destroying the Scarcity Myth of Economics.’ https://www.techdirt.com/2006/11/08/the-importance-of-zero-in-destroying-the-scarcity-myth-of-economics/
[13] Coursera. ‘Free Online Courses from World’s Leading Universities.’ https://www.coursera.org/
[14] SWAYAM (Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds). Government of India. https://swayam.gov.in/
[15] Zomato Limited. Annual Report 2023–24. https://www.zomato.com/investor-relations
[16] Titan Company Limited (Tanishq). Annual Report 2023–24. https://www.titancompany.in/investors
[17] boAt (Imagine Marketing Pvt. Ltd.). ‘About boAt.’ https://www.boat-lifestyle.com/pages/about-us
[18] Apple Inc. ‘Apple Events.’ https://www.apple.com/apple-events/
[19] Pawlowski, A.M. (2025). ‘When Zero Marginal Cost Isn’t Free: The Hidden Costs of Digital Abundance.’ Medium / Bootcamp. https://medium.com/design-bootcamp/when-zero-marginal-cost-isnt-free-the-hidden-costs-of-digital-abundance-1160474dc8ed
[20] Outpile (2025). ‘Zero Marginal Cost Didn’t Kill Capitalism — It Put It on Steroids.’ https://www.outpile.com/en/articles/zero-marginal-cost-capitalism-digital-economy
Billion of Ticket Sales.’ The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/09/arts/music/taylor-swift-eras-tour-ticket-sales.html[12] Techdirt (2006). ‘The Importance of Zero in Destroying the Scarcity Myth of Economics.’ https://www.techdirt.com/2006/11/08/the-importance-of-zero-in-destroying-the-scarcity-myth-of-economics/
[13] Coursera. ‘Free Online Courses from World’s Leading Universities.’ https://www.coursera.org/
[14] SWAYAM (Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds). Government of India. https://swayam.gov.in/
[15] Zomato Limited. Annual Report 2023–24. https://www.zomato.com/investor-relations
[16] Titan Company Limited (Tanishq). Annual Report 2023–24. https://www.titancompany.in/investors
[17] boAt (Imagine Marketing Pvt. Ltd.). ‘About boAt.’ https://www.boat-lifestyle.com/pages/about-us
[18] Apple Inc. ‘Apple Events.’ https://www.apple.com/apple-events/
[19] Pawlowski, A.M. (2025). ‘When Zero Marginal Cost Isn’t Free: The Hidden Costs of Digital Abundance.’ Medium / Bootcamp. https://medium.com/design-bootcamp/when-zero-marginal-cost-isnt-free-the-hidden-costs-of-digital-abundance-1160474dc8ed
[20] Outpile (2025). ‘Zero Marginal Cost Didn’t Kill Capitalism — It Put It on Steroids.’ https://www.outpile.com/en/articles/zero-marginal-cost-capitalism-digital-economy
The aspirational economy does not reward scale or budget. It rewards fluency – in the…
How the smartest brands are shifting from selling to serving and why the line between…
Do brands build value through love or consistent experience? Explore why habit-driven loyalty often outperforms…
Fear often drives buying more than aspiration. Learn how leading brands turn deep consumer anxieties…
Brand aesthetics shape perception, trust, and differentiation by influencing how your brand looks, feels, and…
More Than a Logo: How Leading Organisations Are Rethinking What Brand Actually Means