During colonial rule, there was a problem with deadly cobras in Delhi. In response to the issue, the British government decided to act. To encourage people to kill cobras, the government provided monetary rewards to those who brought the snakeskin as proof. At first glance, their solution appeared to be a sound one.
For the short term, this worked out well. But then some Indians started to breed cobras. The majority of the cobras were killed by the breeders, who then exchanged them for cash. But they also proceeded to breed more of the snakes. This anomaly was finally discovered by the authorities and the incentives were halted. Finally, the breeders released the snakes to the streets because they no longer had an incentive to breed them. Unfortunately, it just served to exacerbate an already dire situation.
During France’s conquest of Vietnam, the same thing occurred. Hanoi was overrun by rats. The authorities offered a reward for each rat’s tail found. After that, people started breeding rats solely for their tails. The rats were released into the city when the bounty was revoked.
The staff were subjected to great pressure from Wells Fargo, which imposed unrealistic sales targets on them. To accomplish their targets, employees opened many unauthorised accounts. Failure to meet targets would mean sacking.
Brigham Young University had to issue a warning of retributive action to students who were intentionally exposing themselves to COVID 19. Getting infected was a ruse by some students to get better incentives for giving plasma. A plasma donation centre offered $50 each for plasma from healthy persons. But people with Covid-19 “convalescent plasma,” received $100. The possibility to earn some extra cash was exploited by several students.
The term “cobra effect” was coined by Horst Siebert, an economist at the University of Bonn. When businesses or governments offer incentives to encourage people to conduct a specific, pro-social activity, the Cobra Effect highlights the unforeseen repercussions and perverse outcomes that might follow.
Devious people may try to exploit any weaknesses to fraudulently claim the incentives from such programmes. When a programme gets corrupted to the point of failure, it can occasionally leave things worse than they were before any incentives were supplied. When this happens, the programme fails.
The “cobra effect” is a term we hear a lot in the corporate world. To address a problem or achieve the desired outcome, business executives make well-intentioned judgments. But sometimes these interventions can worsen a problem.
Anticipating and avoiding perverse outcomes and unintended consequences requires the ability to apply second-order thinking skills to planning and problem-solving. First-order thinking is linear and simplistic: How do we get rid of the cobras? Let’s offer a bounty to people for killing them. Second-order thinking is:
Second-order thinking skills are necessary for predicting and avoiding perverse outcomes and unexpected effects in planning and problem-solving. Using first-order logic, we ask, “How do we get rid of cobras?” Let’s offer an incentive for killing them.
However, in second-order thinking, we have to.
So for example –
Reference: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/machiavellians-gulling-the-rubes/202010/the-cobra-effect-no-loophole-goes-unexploited
Nespresso's strategy wasn't just about leveraging Clooney's fame—it was about crafting a compelling narrative that…
Pet owners' strong desire to ensure their pets' well-being, joy, and longevity drives functional supplement…
Delays at the checkout counter disturb shoppers' mental flow, symbolising a shift from exploration to…
The story of "Intel Inside" exemplifies how visionary marketing can redefine industry norms making it…
Addressing pet obesity through innovative products, enhanced services, and consumer education can benefit both pets…
The power of nostalgia lies in its ability to create emotional connections, but only when…